Showing posts with label abbie normal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abbie normal. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 1, 2020

The Illiterate Lesbo Laughs #1

Jack Kerouac Was A Poser:

Three Travel Books to Read Besides 'On The Road'


Having grown up in the Midwest, Nebraska specifically, I'll admit that in my teens it was very validating  to have my own 'space', open highways and miles and miles of nothing that  constitute most of the Heartland, written about and romanticized in best selling and 'classic' books by well known authors like Jack Kerouac, Allen Ginsberg, and a slew of other sophisticated East coasters that found my home, my 'space', beautiful.  I still read Allen Ginsberg, mostly thanks to his stubborn devotion to politics and social justice, but Kerouac  just doesn't cut it anymore.   In this article I'm going to focus on some ignored or 'lost' masterpieces of 'survival' versus 'travel' texts and the combination of the two.  

The first book is actually two books that can be read together, 'The Big Sea' and 'I Wonder As I Wander' by that legendary (who also got his start in the MIdwest, Topeka, Kansas specifically) and celebrated Poet but underrated prose writer Langston Hughes.  'The Big Sea' is one of those simple yet complex novels, written in an understated style, which probably shows his Midwestern roots, a plain spoken voice that is able to talk about complex subjects in an accessible language.  He  was already a renowned poet, he didn't need to flower up his prose with unnecessary linguistic tricks. The novel starts off with a revolutionary, for a writer and reader anyways, action.  Hughes throws away piles of books into the ocean after becoming a Sailor, at the tender age of 21 years old.  The difference between Kerouac and Hughes is very glaring here.  Kerouac was an  'explorer', whereas Hughes was an 'adventurer', who, you know, needed a goddamn job that would facilitate his journey to see the world.  Kerouac was a sponger and a drunk, which he admits to non-ironically in his novels, whereas Hughes was a worker, a poet, and a 'practical vagabond'.    Both novels, 'The Big Sea' and 'I Wonder As Wander', have Hughes showing his roots growing up in the Midwest, where he wrote some of his most beautiful and famous poems before relocating to Harlem, his adventures, which include traveling to Stalinist Russia, his time in Civil War era Spain, and basically working and traveling all over the globe while also showing the necessity of 'food' and rent money.  This is called reality.  Hughes talks about the times when he had to depend on the kindness/benevolence of strangers throughout his life, and the results weren't usually to his benefit.  He writes about showing one of his patrons, a white woman who was letting him stay with her so he could have more time to focus on his art, a poem in the vein of Carl Sandburg, one of Hughes' earliest heroes.  The reaction of the white patron was ignorant to the point of brutality, her stating that it wasn't 'savage' enough for a black poet.  Hughes, being a person of integrity, left the woman's house never to return again.  After this encounter he became convinced he had a tapeworm in his stomach, even visiting several doctors because the pain was so excruciating.  After several visits to clinics, he was soon to find out that it wasn't a tapeworm, just a sickening disappointment and rage at having been so disrespected and pigeon-holed.  Instead of just drinking up all her alcohol and letting this 'patron of the arts' take care of him like Kerouac, he struck out on his own, soon to become the literary giant his large body of work shows him to be.  That's called integrity.  More writers should possess that trait.  

The second book I would like to delve a little deeper into is 'Down and Out in Paris and London' by the author George Orwell.  I first read it in high school, around the same time I was reading the Beats, and was struck by the lack of romance shown to the situation of brutal poverty that Orwell struggled with during his early days as a writer.  Having grown up mostly with my disabled mom, whose manic episodes usually led her to spend her welfare/disability checks on fast food and K Mart specials in the first three days of the month, leaving me and my sibling to eat peanut butter and stale saltines the rest of the remaining 27 days, I could relate to Orwell's appreciation/degradation of his 'One cup of black tea and a piece of toast' diet that he mostly subsisted on after emigrating from his native India to try and survive in Europe.  This poverty would later reappear in my life during my early sobriety/onset of my schizophrenia.  I'm not going to lie.  After I lost my job due to a major psychotic break which involved the cops being called, I drank and sponged off my loved ones for years.  It was beyond gross, to say the least, and not in the least 'Romantic' as Kerouac often portrays it to be.  But after I sobered up, and learned, you know, LIFE SKILLS, I finally started to take care of myself.  And let's just say it was rough going at first.  My diet subsisted of one Whopper Jr minus the cheese each day, just enough calories to keep me from passing out, and it was cheaper than buying the cooking equipment and supplies needed for the 'beans in a pot' diet that is so popular.  Later this would be replaced by a one gas-station hot dog a day diet.  Let's just say early sobriety/early mental health recovery is  rough.  Orwell's austere tea and toast sounded pretty good after a year of dollar a piece hot dogs that endlessly rotated for hours (who knows, maybe days) at the gas station.  But, now that the alcohol was out of my system and I had gotten on some medication that worked  for me, the act of writing came back into my life.  I didn't imagine myself as Kerouac or Orwell, my ego thankfully wasn't big enough for that anymore, but CREATION, a life saving tool for me in my youth, had reappeared like a long lost friend.  I didn't worry about being published, I didn't worry about the grease and pig scraps in my stomach, I didn't worry about anything besides scribbling away in my Moleskine journal in a tiny town off the Mexican border in Arizona where I was living at the time.  That, fellow writers, is  deliverance  and redemption.  Much better than the youthful dramatized death that some unpublished writers dream of.  Trust me.  Put down the glass, needle, or pipe, and just get back to  the sensation of ink staining a page for the  joy of it.  You may never be published, but it's better than pissing the bed every night and chewing on a mouthful of puke.  Have a cup of tea instead, and if you're lucky, some toast.

The third travel/survival book has become pretty popular recently, and for very good reasons.  'La Batarde' by Viollette Leduc is a twentieth century classic of very HUMAN tenacity, and by that I mean that the narrator is not perfect, nor does she pretend to be.  She scrapes, swindles, and triumphs in equal measures throughout her long memoir.  She HAS to.  Some of us can't afford to be moral all the time.  Her voice is filled with pain, but her possession of poetic prose and her real life circumstances keep her from being a victim.  Starting her life in an orphanage, it is no wonder that failed early relationships and heartbreak and loss take up the lions share of the work.  But I would like to focus on the last third of the book, which shows that bare bones survival is rarely pretty, but it is always human.  In the end of the book she is not traveling, but running for her life, literally.  It is set during Nazi occupied France, and she retreats outside of Paris to escape the regime.  During this time she doesn't protest or join the French Resistance.  She just does what she has to do to SURVIVE, at any and all costs, this skill probably ingrained in her after her troubled youth.  She was a black market smuggler, bringing in goods from the country, sneaking past SS inspection stations at the risk of her life, all to deliver to wealthy Parisians who could merely 'sit out the Fascism' due  to their ethnicity/abilities and wealth privilege.  This reminds me of our last four years during the Trump regime, as the armchair amateur politicos sat around in bars and considered being accidentally mis-gendered a hate crime, turning cannibal on each other instead of fighting the Fascists, and sipping fair trade organic coffee at five bucks a shot in some gentrified neighborhood cafe.  And yes, I've spent my beyond-too-long share of time in the Pacific Northwest.  Am I being bitter right now?  Yup.  Do I care?  Nope.  And maybe that is what draws me to Leduc's voice in 'La Batarde'.  She doesn't moralize or try to make herself look good.  She  just states things as they happened, in a voice more poetic than any of the traveling Beats could ever hope to possess.  She was a survivor more than a traveler, though if you do it right, both can coexist in life as well as art.

So, even though Kerouac and the Beats helped 'legitimize', artistically at least, the American Midwest, and helped me when I was fourteen and found these books of travel and freedom hidden away in my dad's dusty old cardboard boxes, I think they have done more harm than good to the Midwesterner who either wants to stay put and make changes where they're at, or escape to the artistic/queer bubbles on the Coasts, (and I've done both, and don't regret either life choice).  At this point we need a new 'Guide' besides the drunken loser who so many of my childhood friends have emulated.  And I hope it isn't just one 'rock star' writer or musician or activist who does this.  I hope it involves ALL of us, irrespective of 'community', 'crowd', or what's becoming more and more popular these days, the 'clique', whose formulas we should have given up on in Junior High. At this point, in late stage/accelerated Capitalism, we need new 'Maps', not 'Guides'.


 

Thursday, November 26, 2020

Free Poetry Thrifty Three Thursday

Every Thursday I will be sharing three poems from either unpublished/in progress works or books that have already been published.  Free libraries and small bookstores please get in touch if you want FREE copies of my books.


This is a poem from an upcoming collection entitled 'Lighting Saints On Fire To Ignite The World':


Feeding More Than The Five Thousand (Prayer for Dorothy Day) 

You never considered yourself a feminist.  You were so tough it didn’t matter.  Let Gloria Steinem collect the checks while you handed out bread and beefsteak, fish on Fridays and pancake feeds for the masses in dingy basements.  That’s called work. 

You loved art, literature of all stripes, Dostoevsky and Tolstoy more important than Bakunin and Goldman. 

You tried to save your brother, so did I.  I’m not sure how that turned out for you, my older brother Schizophrenic and abandoned in the Deep South.  Maybe you just tried harder.

I want to try harder, to be giving and loving and unselfish.  I’m learning, as you probably learned. 

Place a rose behind my ear and call me ‘honey’, your ghost fingers soon to be canonized.

I’m selfishly awaiting my chance to unselfishly hand out a loaf of bread.     

/

Excerpt from 'Joan Of Arc Was a Murderer':

Flight

Screaming frantic and snot-faced and secret girl,

my body thrashing demon and all my aunts are terrified of this shaking beast, kicking and screaming but only tapping on denim knees with Spiderman slippers, 

and was I ever an angel?

I wonder if I was ever graced with something as freeing as wings?

/

Excerpt from the unpublished work entitled 'Your Lips Are Like A Scarlet Thread' based on the freedom of sexuality in the Song of Solomon.  

 

 J.

 

All the red scrapes and green rot we’ve been through

disappear

as I pin your wrists to the headboard

and flex my hips strong and sure.

Your look of fear,

that blister of your childhood,

bursts as your moans shake my voice box,

vocalizing the bass thrums between my legs

and there is no violence anymore

as our grownup selves

kiss Heaven’s broken harp

and let ghosts die,

the huge death allowing us

not just to survive, but to thrive.

 

 


Wednesday, November 25, 2020

Art Dyke Diatribe #1

Michelangelo's Beef Cake Dykes and Egon Schiele's Feminine Masculinities

As a muscly queer woman myself, more like 'wiry' actually, (I don't have the skeletal framework to hold up a lot of bulk), I was very frustrated when I first saw images and videos of trans women who were giving advice to other trans women in early transition on how to 'pass' and conform their bodies to a thin, 'feminine' ideal.  This included NOT working out and most of the time freaky (let's just call them what they are, puritanical hippiedom and anti-fat) diet plans.  I am NOT saying anything against thin women, trans or cis, since I was 5' 11" and 140 pounds most of my life, but like I said before, I enjoy being 'wiry'.  Think 'Bad Santa Era' Billy Bob Thornton with tits. 

My childhood well muscled heroines were few and far between, but thanks to the gender bending 1980's, (yes I am 41 years young), they were at least there.  Private Vasquez, played by Jenette Elise Goldstein, in all her tough, rippling glory steals the show in the 1986 film Aliens and there was also Annie Lennox flexing her guns on the covers of Eurythmics' albums and MTV.  And last but NOT least, Grace frickin' Jones.     

Then, let's just say my vision got blurred from the ages of 11 to 31 with alcohol.  A LOT of alcohol.  And pretty much anything to do with, or even thinking about my body, disappeared.  Fast forward through early recovery and all the great triumphs and beautiful missteps of THAT voyage, and I finally started to live my life as a trans woman, but I wasn't seeing the women I wanted to be.  That wouldn't come until I entered the world of that most anti-punk edifice of 'Art Theory'.

To give you some background on my education, I really didn't have much. I'm not playing the victim here, I'm just pointing out that school and I never really got along.  It didn't help that I was bullied and messed with since pre-school for being an overly emotional kid, at that time living my life as a boy and failing miserably.  So from the ages of 12 to 17 I was mostly hanging out in Midwestern drainage ducts drinking straight gin or driving around in my crappy car listening to the Cramps, the Minutemen and Heavens to Betsy and wishing I was anywhere else but Nebraska.  I usually only showed up for English class and creative writing courses, but that was about it. I dropped out at 17 because I would have had to spend another year to graduate. I'm surprised Lincoln Public Schools let me last that long.   BUT, and this is a big but, I also had the advantage of a great, and I do mean great, public library system in Nebraska and had no censorship on what I could read. I was a curious kid, and still consider myself a proud bookworm.

But art was beyond  me.  I always thought it was too high brow and stuffy and for college kids.  And then I started dating a woman with an MFA from Syracuse, who I fell deeply in love with and whom I'm still lucky enough to have in my life today.  We're actually 'gay married', or 'Queermied', and while I'm writing this she's in the other room working on her own artsy projects.  Being the artist she is, she took me to the Sheldon Art Gallery, which little did I know is recognized as having the best collection of Modern art in the Midwest besides Minneapolis.  All in my own humble hometown of Lincoln, Nebraska.  I've seen Alice Neel's work there, Hans Hoffman 'colored squares' pieces, a picture of a sandwich by Jasper Johns, Franz Kline's signature black and white abstract paintings, a Mark Rothko piece, and I was even lucky enough to view a magenta and turquoise period piece by my favorite of all the New York Abstract Expressionists, Lee Krasner.  And what did I do after seeing all this genius?  I made fun of it.  Because, as the three or four people who know me know, I'm kind of a dick.  

But, being the curious bookish type I've always been, I wanted to know more.  At my partner's place later that night I started flipping through her art history books.  Then  I saw what I had been looking for instead of the thin stereotypical beauty standards that a lot of trans women were pushing my way.  I saw big, tough women who could kick ass. The infamous women of Michelangelo.  These portraits of women are often denigrated by art critics as being done only because they think since Michelangelo was a big ol' homo he just slapped tits on male bodies because he didn't know how to paint women.  I think we're REALLY underestimating Michelangelo here if we just stick to that simple conclusion.  He was a bright guy, a hell of a lot smarter than most of the folks of his time period, and definitely smarter than me. Or can't we return to that beautiful (almost lost) art of 'queering' an image or song or film?  And just interpreting art as WE see it, individually, instead of always listening to so called experts?  I myself would just personally like to give Mikey the benefit of the doubt, and say he was doing it on purpose, especially because if you look through his body of work not all of his women were portrayed like muscle queens, although a large and in charge majority of them were.  What his purpose was I'm not sure, but I really don't think it was because he didn't know how to draw women.  He just didn't know how to draw the 'Right' type of women.

And what about the right type of 'man'?  Or images that can't be interpreted as easily identifiable as male/female in art, the gender-queers of the art world, as it were?  Here we have to go to the short lived Austrian Egon Schiele.  

Any old or new breed of 70's feminist will probably be offended by his work, and by saying that I realize I'm an old fashioned oversexed 90's feminist, which was 25 YEARS AGO, and to all the Millennials and Generation Z's out there, time has a way of sneaking up on you eventually, and yes even you will seem old fashioned someday.  It happens to the best of us.  Some left and right wing puritans will be offended by his blatant objectification of women.  But the point they're missing is that he objectified EVERYTHING, even himself.

The figures he created are splayed almost always pornographically/erotically, and no there is no difference between the two. I mean that in the best way possible.  He drew a lot of lesbian images in the early 1900's, which is saying something, and no I don't think he did it just to titilate a male audience.  ALL art is for ALL people.  It's how we choose to see a piece of art that defines it, period.     

His women are lush, varying from razor thin to voluptuous.  His male figures tend to lean towards the 'waif' category, possibly emulating his own stick figure frame.  But a large body of his work sticks to the 'inbetween' of gender.  His 'males' seem to thrust their breasts forward wantonly, and yes males have breasts, trans men and cis men alike.  His women are brazen and intelligent, even with their skirts up to their waists and their legs spread there is still personal agency and they possess ownership of themselves.  Sometimes it is impossible to guess the gender of the figures he is painting or drawing, which is, you know, perfect.  He died very young of  the Spanish flu, the Covid-19 of his time, but produced a  beautiful body of work before he and his wife were so cruelly cut down by the disease.  

In these times we have to look for our own heroes or heroines or just plain beautiful people, to our eyes at least, to keep on truckin' as we Nebraskans say, and keep on loving, and keep on living.  We'll get through this ugly and despicable time in American History, and once again enjoy the freedom to create our own desires and dreams and wishes, whether written on the page, painted on a canvas, or the feeling of your dream self's flesh leaning against the shoulders of the giants who came before us.

    

The Invisible Woman in Plain Sight Speaks Up #1

The Audacity of Wearing Pants...With Pockets   I have always been a Nebraskan woman, even when Nebraska has had issues with me.  When I tran...